Archive for January, 2009

What the Nintendo Wii taught me.

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

Obviously, the praise heaped on Nintendo for their revolutionary take on the video game console is well worth it and been done to death.  I, however, recently had my first experience with the Wii and feel that there’s a bit more to the story.

Yes, you appreciate Nintendo targeting non-gamers, which was a brilliant strategy, but I think there are even more fundamental marketing chords that Nintendo managed to strike with this product.

  1. Shared experience.  One thing that I think has been lost somewhat in the world of gaming is a real shared experience.  Gaming progressed to its own subculture as opposed to the inclusive entertainment console of its humble beginnings.  In 1982 my family got an Intellivision (a competitor to Atari - and far better than Atari in my humble opinion).  Years later my parents would tell me that they stayed up late, carefully unpacked it, and played it in the days leading up to Christmas while my brother and I slept.  This explained why my dad was an instant whiz at Q-Bert and my mom quickly mastered Dungeons & Dragons.Before the Wii, could you imagine parents waiting all day to put you to bed so they could hang out and play Playstation 2?  For all the fancy graphics and online gaming capabilities, the actual personal connection has basically disappeared.  The other people playing are simply names or voices with nothing more to them.  Gaming, for many, is simply done in isolation.  This year I visited my brother in California and one of the most fun evenings was playing Wii bowling with him and my parents.  I kept playing in a futile attempt to finally roll a 300 (I topped out at 290, damn!).  But it actually created and fostered interaction, which is easier due to the game’s simplicity.  It’s just like cracking out one of those ancient artifacts…what do you call them…board games?  Yes, board games!
  2. This brings up another great point.  The Wii went WAY back to basics in my opinion, re-examining the basic value proposition of video games themselves.  FUN.  It’s all about fun.  The arms race that has taken place in terms of graphics capability, blue ray compatability and such has left a trail of dead that includes former industry giants like Sega, Atari and also rans like the Turbo Grafx 16 (Bonk the Caveman, anyone?)In college my friends worked night jobs and we used to get home and play Intellivision bowling.  It was the most simple game ever, much like Wii Sports, but it was addictively fun in its simplicity.  I think the Nintendo DS (along with the success of some cell phone games) taught some valuable lessons in how easy it is to entertain people.

So thank you Nintendo for providing some valuable lessons in identifying and capitalizing on marketing insights.  Going back to basics can provide a lot of valuable lessons and provide profitable results.  Somewhere, I’m sure Super Mario is smiling.

Pay per click advertising for branded terms…a slippery slope.

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

I got involved in a discussion board thread today where someone was lauding the success of their branded PPC campaign. The clickthrough rate was through the roof! Turns out, they had a 22 percent CTR since starting up the campaign. That sounds great, doesn’t it?

But what if you’re already ranked number one organically? Is it really worth it to be paying for clicks as well? It seems in some instances, the answer to that question is yes.  But that study was done with Honda in the ridiculously competitive car industry.  We’re not all swimming in those waters, and it’s important to remember that.

I think this is a great copout for agencies and internal marketing groups who are knowingly or unknowingly trying to grab as many marketing dollars as possible with logic such as, “Look how well our branded terms converted last month!”

The correct response here is skepticism.  “So?”

This is when you need to start asking them some tough questions.

  • So for our branded terms, aren’t we already ranked number one organically?
  • How many companies are competing with us for our own branded terms?
  • Since we’ve started running the PPC campaign, are we getting more traffic from branded terms?
  • Do the PPC ads convert better than the organic traffic?

If the answers to these questions are

  • Yes
  • None or not many
  • No
  • No

then it’s time to hit the brakes.  Shut down the branded terms immediately and compare your results without pay per click.  If your conversions stay the same, I’m sorry to tell you that your PPC campaign has been ruining the ROI of every one of your conversions.

Give a good hard look at your PPC campaigns folks, it can be easy to inflate a campaign but to what end?  Trying to get a positive ROI on a campaign just for the sake of having a PPC campaign is bad marketing.  If SEO has your branded terms handled, step back, and start re-thinking how paid search can fit into your marketing plan (or if it has to at all).

So your new web designer is optimizing for search engines, eh?

Monday, January 19th, 2009

I titled this blog in honor of Joe Ford, who often is mistaken for a Canadian.  To clear things up, Joe is not a Canadian, but he does really like hockey.

Anyhow, I’ve noticed a recurring theme when talking to some development companies lately, as well as individuals who are either in the process of, or have just recently re-designed their website.  Getting that new website live is an exciting thing.  Ours is getting ready to go live, too, so trust me when I say I understand the feeling.  But, getting the site live may not be the shot in the arm you thought it was going to be.

Why?  Well, remember when your designer said they make search engine friendly websites?  Turns out, this means a lot of different things to a lot of different people.  Let me just run down a few variations that I’ve heard lately:

  1. The developer provides you with a CMS that allows you to have control over basic SEO properties like meta data.  Particularly if they don’t actually do some research and input this for you (or tell you what to input) there’s really no value in this “SEO“.  You have been given a shell and you need to create the structure.  Nearly all content management systems now allow you to manage basic functions like meta data.  Needless to say, unless you, or someone else takes the time to do keyword research and write meta data and page content, your provider has done nothing for you in terms of search engine optimization.
  2. Your designer runs some form of compliance check or code validation (WC3 for example).   These can be helpful to make sure you don’t have any gratuitous errors that will upset the search engines, but it’s just a precaution, not something that will actively help you rank higher.
  3. The developer will do sitemap and/or search engine submission.  Finally, something that might show some benefits.  However, this is pretty rudimentary and doesn’t take much to do.  Nor will it show any significant results in industries that are even moderately competitive.  One nice feature, though, is that doing site map submissions to Google Webmaster Tools, Yahoo Site Explorer and MSN’s Webmaster Center will provide you a wealth of information as to how well your site is being index, identify potential issues, and even show you some of your rankings (this can be very useful for newer sites to see what terms you are initially having success with that you may not have specifically targeted).
  4. Directory submission(s).  An oldie but still a goodie.  If your provider does this, it can certainly show some results.  Quality directories like Dmoz and Yahoo have good page rank and can provide strong back links.  But once again, it may take a lot of link building to really achieve strong rankings, so don’t think a couple basic submissions are going to be a magic bullet.   This can, however, provide nice groundwork for ongoing optimization.

So, with this in mind, don’t be afraid to ask a few questions to your developer as to just what type of “optimization” they really provide.  Most likely, even the companies that are providing components with tangible benefits are onlytaking the first step in what will be an ongoing mission of link building and site optimization.

Doing web analytics? Why not integrate that data into your CRM?

Wednesday, January 14th, 2009

I’ve found that a tremendous amount of material relating to web analytics tends to relate to the needs of billion dollar companies or is so rudimentary that it provides little value except to those just cutting their teeth on the topic.  There is a missing middle ground here, particularly for the typical SMB, where there are opportunities to better use available data within their existing systems.

Many SMBs are advertising online (as Microsoft’s recent survey showed 41 percent of small businesses are using paid search marketing), be it with AdWords or some other channel.  However, in my own personal experience I’m still surprised as to the amount of companies that throw money at online advertising initiatives and don’t do any tracking (or simply don’t leverage the data available to them).  I won’t bemoan this subject, but if you’re advertising online or doing any form of search engine marketing, start using your data! It’s in your own best interest to make sure you’re getting a return on your investment.  Whoever is running your campaign, whether they are internal or external, demand that they provide detailed reporting.  Basics here include click through rate, quality of visit, goal conversion and return on ad spend.

Going past this foundation of tracking your online marketing effectiveness, I’ll take the next logical step that many companies seem to miss, and that’s integrating web analytics data with their CRM systems. Strangely, many companies take great strides to track every imaginable offline initiative, from direct mail, point of purchase displays, to trade shows, online marketing campaigns are often ignored, despite the wealth of actionable data they provide.  Actionable, of course, is the key word here.  Given the fluidity of online marketing, the ability to shut down or modify a campaign that begins to lag makes all the sense in the world.  Looking at things more optimistically, by plugging this data into your CRM, it offers the ability to identify missed opportunities and shift your campaigns to take advantage of these opportunities.

First, let me explain the disconnect, as I often see this working from an agency perspective.  The client comes to us with the need of “conversion”.  Whether that’s online sales or leads doesn’t matter.  We, the agency, have a defined goal of converting traffic into one of those two buckets.  On their end, our customer must either fulfill the order and then manage that business opportunity going forward, or take that lead and convert it into a sale.  Most often, the client will be happy if the agency is providing a steady stream of purchases, and can show that their services are providing a solid return on their investment.  Who can argue when your vendor is making you money, right?

Things get a bit dicier when it comes to lead generation, as there is a much larger gray area between an online lead conversion and that lead eventually signing on as a customer.  Obviously, the customer is going to want as many high qualified, quality leads as possible, but assigning accountability to closing the eventual sale can easily become a point of contention.  However, much like in the aforementioned ecommerce scenario, the client will probably be happy if they appear to be getting a steady stream of leads and can see that some basic metric for online lead conversion is being met.

These two scenarios are very common, and countless vendors, clients, and companies that manage this process in house are completely satisfied with this scenario.  I would argue that this is just the tip of the iceberg, and it’s the fault of each side that complacency is reached at this early step in terms of utilizing data.  For clients, I would think they should be more demanding of the long term efficacy of these online initiatives, and truly squeezing every last cent of profitability out of their campaign(s).  It’s not enough to simply be getting a return, what about maximizing that return?

From an agency perspective, while it must be handled with kid gloves, it serves both sides better to push the client to truly get the most out of your efforts.  If they have additional systems that can assist you in performing your service better, why wouldn’t you do it?  It’s not as if there aren’t an overwhelming number of companies out there chomping at the bit to replace you (and many of these are probably a fair bit cheaper, as well).  So to justify your price point, and to prove your value to your clients, it would make sense to be as proactive as possible lest you get left behind once a savvy CMO shows up and starts asking why you’re not leveraging every possible piece of data available.

In the offline examples mentioned earlier, it’s a safe bet that most companies, particularly in a time of tightening marketing budgets, gauge the quality of leads obtained at trade show events or from different versions of direct mailers and the life time value of those customers.  This, of course, is a sensible, accountable approach to marketing.  Doing anything less than this with online marketing, which actually can be done much more simply and granularly, is a missed opportunity.

Breaking it down to the tactical level, it comes down to leveraging the cookie data from your campaigns to track the minutiae of your campaign, and understand the long term effects of these details on your broader business goals.  Cookie data can provide information on originating source of the lead, such as the referring ad, specific search phrase, PPC campaign, ad text and more.  Over time, it’s not enough to know how well you’re turning web leads into business.  You will want to know the specifics of which leads provide the best opportunity conversion rates.  Perhaps even more importantly, you can see which sources are providing the best lifetime customer value.  With this in mind, you can appropriate your online spend in a way that maximizes overall return for your client (making you an even bigger hero than you already are).

As an example, let’s say an online sporting goods retailer sells a variety of baseball equipment.  For our sake we will say they only carry three product lines and have a campaign going for each.  The three campaigns they have going, one for clothing and apparel, one for baseball gloves, and the other for bats all show acceptable conversion rates and return on ad spend.  In many situations, this is the end of the line, with the client happily patting the vendor on the back and cutting them a check for their work each month.  But wouldn’t it make a lot of sense to know which of these campaigns was bringing in repeat business?

What if they passed along the cookie data showing which keywords were driving their most profitable long term customers into their CRM system?  With that data, we might find that customers who click on the PPC ads for baseball gloves rarely ever purchase another product.  But customers who buy bats, we find, tend to buy at least one new one each year, making them far more profitable!  This is valuable information to know when allocating funds for a PPC budget.

Taking it a step further, we may find that specific brands of bats (people who searched for Easton as opposed to Louisville Slugger, for example) have a much greater propensity for repeat purchases.  This begs the question, “Why?”  Of course the next step would be to start some doing some additional research, like examining competitors.  Perhaps the Easton prices are better than competitors’, while the Louisville Slugger prices are slightly above the competition.  Through aggressive pricing, Easton customers become loyal repeat customers, while Louisville Slugger purchasers may be lost as they do more comparison shopping in the future.  Perhaps that’s not the case, maybe Louisville Slugger bats are just a lot more durable, leading to less purchases over time.  Either way, we have a solid basis to start asking the right questions and a starting point for doing some qualitative information gathering from past customers, as well as adding some in-site surveying tools.

Surprisingly, integrating these data points isn’t nearly as difficult as it may seem.  Most analytics providers have a method worked out where you can pass along cookie data to your CRM system.  As Google Analytics is such a popular option, it’s worth checking out the fine work done by the folks at EpikOne to lay out exactly what needs to be done from a coding standpoint to get the Google cookies integrated into your CRM.

It’s likely that ad budgets are going to lean increasingly toward digital in coming years (particularly paid search and SEO), which provides the opportunity to move first to use data as a competitive advantage, and build this type of infrastructure into your CRM reporting and overall marketing strategy.  It makes sense to use every tool in the toolkit, and if you’re doing online marketing, this extra step can provide valuable information for making optimal marketing decisions as your campaign budgets continue to trend toward online initiatives.

Google Analytics vs. Yahoo vs. MSN…who’s right?

Friday, January 9th, 2009

Analytics superhero (and one of my five favorite people I’ve never met in person) Avinash Kaushik wrote a marvelous blog recently about reconciling conflicting data between different platforms.  Reading it, of course, would scare the bejesus out of the web analytics beginner, and rightfully so.  However, I was at odds when Avinash seemed to recommend taking one platform and running with it.

Now, who am I to question his advice?  Well, I think it depends on the audience.  There are an immense amount of small companies (trust me, I talk to them all the time) who are using analytics but don’t understand that the data is, and always has been “dirty”.  This isn’t an exact science yet folks.  Beginners and casual analytics users may not always get this, which is why I always recommend that people use a few different analytics packages, to understand that the data’s not perfect.

This of course, leads to inquiry, which the man himself is a huge champion of.  Understand how metrics are defined from one platform to the next (they’re rarely the same), and how each collects information.  You’d be surprised of the differences.  If you have huge discrepancies, go right to your vendor and ask!  It’s that simple.  Ultimately, I think it’s important to ask the right questions, and when you see the differences (by using multiple platforms), you’ll have a better idea what to ask.

If you haven’t done this before, let me show you a couple days worth of data from a very low volume site with MSN Analytics, Yahoo Web Analytics and Google Analytics.  The metric of interest here is visitor origin.

First, Google:

google analytics report

I’m a big proponent of Google, and find myself working with GA as my primary tool more and more as they continue to make improvements.  I’ve found historically, particularly for geographic data, that they are more accurate when compared to other platforms (based on other available data).

Next, Yahoo over the same time frame:

yahoo web analytics report

Finally, MSN:

msn

Quite the disparity, huh?  For people starting out in analytics, I think this is a necessary lesson.  One of the most difficult things in this business is to explain to people that the data’s not perfect.  There’s a confidence level that you must come to, communicate that (to your boss, client, or whomever) when you supply these reports.  Otherwise, you’re putting yourself, your company, or your client at risk.  None of those are good things if you’re scoring at home.

It’s been a while since I looked into the technical specifics for each platform (not sure if I’ve ever looked into Microsoft’s too closely, since I don’t use it very often), but Google’s method for calculating location is as follows (as found here):

Google Analytics uses your visitors’ IP address to determine where they are located geographically. Using a 3rd-party datasource, the IP address is translated to a physical location. In most cases, Google Analytics is able to determine where your visitors are coming from; however, if our 3rd party vendor does not have an accurate record of the IP address to determine the location, Google Analytics will display a “(not set)” entry.

So, my recommendation?  Try a few different platforms, get the feel for them and start to understand how to proceed with “dirty” data.  Trust me, it’s more fun than it sounds.


Copyright © 2010 Search Marketing Insomniac…The Blog of Adam Henige. All Rights Reserved.
No computers were harmed in the 0.702 seconds it took to produce this page.

Designed/Developed by Lloyd Armbrust & hot, fresh, coffee.